Clarifying verification options
This seems to be about local search tasks. For web searches, using curl and a search engine isn't straightforward. I could suggest tools like ddgr or lynx, but they’re not installed. So, I should ask the user if they want verification and permission to browse instead. I’ll keep it simple by offering a few context options, like summarizing info or verifying it. Then, I’ll present key points and suggest checking sources if they want to proceed.
这是在分享一条进展吗，还是想让我帮你解读/核实？
可选帮忙方向：
- 快速解读：这类“上诉被驳回+承担诉费+3000欧元赔偿+某日终审”的组合，通常意味着原审结论在关键点上被维持，3000欧多为程序性/象征性金额，12月6日的终审将给出最终不可再上诉的裁决，多为经济纠纷层面，对出场资格/转会通常无直接影响。
- 时间线梳理：把相关诉讼节点、主张与法院意见简要整理。
- 法律要点：争议焦点（合同义务、奖金/肖像权、违约责任等）和可能判决走向。
- 事实核验：我可以帮你查证并给出权威来源链接。
你希望我做哪一个？如果要我核实，请确认是否需要我联网查证并给出来源。